Categorized | Climate, COP 15

1 in 6.2 billion

COPENHAGEN — Writers are often cautioned not to use the word “unique” but it appears that this is the best description of me as a new arrival in Copenhagen. Trying to save on carbon and cash, I tolerated the circular bus ride through wet traffic from the central railway station to the Bella Center, where the climate change negotiations are taking place. I’ve attended many UN climate conferences in the past, and recall regretting on several occasions the long registration lines at peak arrival times. On this cold, dark and rainy evening in Copenhagen, I was confident that this scenario was not in my future. In the end, I was right. I hardly made it two steps into the conference center when I was told that the registration desk closed at 6 pm. “You’re the only person in the world who didn’t know this,” I was told by the ornery badge checker.

As I shivered outside, dreaming of long indoor cues I texted warmer colleagues in the Bella Center. “This is like nothing before – CRAZY!” wrote veteran climate delegate and policy guru Ellina Levina of the Center for Clean Air Policy. Other colleagues reported of progress in a number of areas of the negotiation, especially on the institutional architecture needed to deliver clean energy and adaptation technologies to developing countries. Near-term financing to implement these technologies will be decided next week. Also on the inside, Yvo De Boer, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, shared his views on the Kyoto Protocol (most likely in a dry and heated room). He said that the Kyoto Protocol is the only legally binding instrument we have for now and until a new treaty emerges, there’s no reason to abandon it. Secondly, the Kyoto Protocol created the infrastructure of the global carbon market. Without it, the global carbon market won’t function. When a new treaty does materialize, this market infrastructure needs to be incorporated to sustain a strong carbon market. Project Catalyst estimates such a market could drive roughly $2 trillion in annual investment in clean technologies by 2020 if emissions caps are set to limit warming to 2 degrees Celsius. At the same time, De Boer acknowledges the need for a process that engages the United States and broader participation of developing countries. The United States has made it clear that it will not join the Kyoto Protocol, a treaty that was firmly rejected by Congress even before it was finalized. Contemplating participation in the Kyoto Protocol would be political suicide for President Obama.
While it took some digging, I did find the registration desk hours on the UNFCCC website, on the fourth page of an “information for participants” booklet, but I’m sure you already knew that.

No related posts.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Koffend/1124015700 Chris Koffend

    Here’s the problem – aligning climate temperatures to caps on emissions!  If the climate of the earth was stable over long periods of time, such an approach could logically be implemented.

    But history of the earths temperature ranges show that they are constantly changing.  The earth cools, warms, cools, warms and this will continue regardless of whether man existed or did not exist.  The global warming people like to look at very short periods of history to determine what the temperature of the planet should be.  They love to point out the periods going way back in climate history to ice ages, yet fail to recognize those periods of significant warming.

    The US’ southwestern part of the country is a great example.  We have seen what to us is a long period of cooler and wetter weather that climate history suggests as being the norm.  However, we have acclimated to the climate trends we have seen over the past 25-200 years.  Even though there have been warnings, long before the politically popular call of global warming catastrophe supporters, that the SW USA was in a period of unnatural coolness and wetness.  The warnings stated hat we were under the false impression that the cooler and wetter climate we were experiencing the SW was not the long term norm.  That water levels were unusually high and the availability of water for the population and agricultural needs were unsustainable.  This is going all the way back to the 1950s.  Yet now, when we see this reality taking shape, it seems to be a surprise to all and the belief that it is caused purely by man’s activities on our planet.

    The earth will warm, which it is doing now.  But just as it has in the past, it will then cool.  Wash, rinse and repeat, perpetual.  

    We should treat out environment well, not because of global warming, but because it is the responsible thing to do.  Just like the calls for oil extinction of the 1970s that oil would be all consumed by the turn of the century, this too will be looked at historically as the scientists making another fear mongering mistake.

    Oh to be so powerful as has been assigned to us humans that we control the temperature of the earth.  Whatever, could the earth have done before we existed?  Who or what was to blame for the warming and cooling periods of the past?

  • Vinyl Banners

    Thanks for providing us such a priceless information.That is
    really helpful for us.

     

  • Adam lisit

    Thank you
    for spending a time on sharing such informative writings to us. I will
    bookmark your page and looking forward to read some more of your writings
    soon.


    гостиницы
    петербурга

     

  • Vijayasingh777

    I love ur post about this grea information it’s nice to read and give informative details.

GMF on Twitter


Calendar

December 2009
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031